Home Motorcycles Yamaha Raider vs. Honda Fury: Sizzle vs. Fizzle

Random Image

dsc00426.jpg

Weather

51°
11°
°F | °C
Partly Cloudy
Humidity: 98%
Sun
Partly Cloudy
58 | 77
14 | 25
Mon
Isolated Thunderstorms
56 | 82
13 | 27
Tue
Windy
48 | 71
8 | 21
Wed
Partly Cloudy
56 | 71
13 | 21

Donate Now

Help keep this site up and running

Yamaha Raider vs. Honda Fury: Sizzle vs. Fizzle PDF Print E-mail
Written by jallen@acesiowa.com   
Thursday, 26 November 2009 12:19

In the past couple of years, major motorcycle manufactures have embraced the 'custom motorcycle' market.  Their approach has been to produce machines that appear custom right off of the line.  Victory Motorcycles was the first to go to market with factory customs.  Two of these production custom cruisers are the Yamaha Raider and the Honda Fury.  These two bikes lean towards the chopper end of the cruiser segment.  As such, it is natural to want them compared.

The Yamaha Raider is in it's third year of production.  Essentially unchanged since it's introduction, the Raider boasts an air cooled 1900 V-Twin engine.  The 113 ci (1854cc) beast has been in the Stratoliner for five model years and in the Raider all three years.  The torquey V-Twin posts respectable out-of-the-box performance numbers.  80 HP at the rear with 98 foot pounds of torque.  Highly tweakable, the full spectrum of Raider performance and modifications has yet to be reached.

Silver Raider vs FuryYamaha Raider VS Honda Fury

The Honda Fury is in it's second year of production. The 1312cc engine is a liquid cooled V-Twin borrowed from the VTX 1300 line.  The 80 ci V-Twin sports some typical performance numbers.  Almost 57 HP at the rear with 70 foot pounds of torque.  Had Honda opted for the bigger VTX1800 powerplant, the comparison would have been much more interesting.  The Fury's presentation is a little unfinished.  However, there are more factory options available for the Fury than there are for the Raider.  Honda's ABS being the foremost of these options (Yamaha?).

Fury vs RaiderSilver Fury vs Raider

 

The numbers in a side-by-side comparison:

Item Raider Fury
ABS option No Yes
Body Parts Metal Plastic
Bore x Stroke 100 x 118 89 x 104
Compression 9.48:1 9.2:1
Cooling Air Liquid
Displacement 1854 cc 1312 cc
Final Drive Belt Shaft
Front Tire 120/70-21 90/90-21
Fuel Capacity 4.1 gallons 3.4 gallons
Fuel Delivery Fuel Injected Fuel Injected
Gearbox 5 speed 5 speed
Rake 39 degrees (33 + 6 yoke) 38 degrees
Rear Tire 210/40-18 200/50-18
Seat Height 27.4 inches 26.7 inches
Throttle Body
Twin bore 38mm
Trail 4.02 inches 3.5 inches
Valve train Push rods 4 valves per cylinder SOHC 3 valves per cylinder
Weight 692 lbs 663 lbs
Wheelbase 70.9 inches 71.24 inches

 

Comeliness:

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  The Raider is a little too busy, especially around the engine compartment.  Would've liked to see more of that big 48 degree V-Twin. The Raider's styling and lines are appealing to the eye.  It is easy to let your eyes glide from the front to back, top to bottom. The Fury's plastic parts and large open areas are distracting to the eye.  What was intended for lean and clean, comes off more as plain and simple.   As you look over the Fury, you find yourself missing something, waiting for something.

 

Rider's review:

The Fury's 38 degree of rake and longer forks do give more of that chopper feel while cruising.  It also suffers from 'chopper' handling at lower speeds.  The 80 cubic inch Fury engine is responsive, however, does not inspire one to think "Fury".  "Temper Tantrum" would better fit the bikes performance.  Honda, if you are paying attention, to make the Fury a live up to its name, give it the 1800 powerplant!

 

Riding Fury versus Raider

The Raider's 39 degree of rake is divided by 33 degrees of true rake, plus 6 degrees of rake in the yoke. Combine this with the shorter forks and you get a really well behaved machine at slower speeds.  The 113 cubic inch engine pulls well from any speed.  The XUP valve controls back pressure, ensuring optimum torque in all gears through the lengthy power range.

Riding Raider versus Fury

Both the Raider and the Fury's highway cruising are stabilized by the use of a 21" narrow front tire offset by the wide 210+ rear rubber.  Those fat rear tires dramatically reduce chopper weave while at speed.

 

Conclusion:

The Raider is a blast to ride. Smoking performance, hot looks.  The Raider is one of the few production bikes that draws positive praise and comments while in traffic.  The Fury draws looks as well, but confusion isn't the most desirable expression to be seen on an observers face.  The distinct lack of umph from the Fury's engine makes the machine miss it's mark.  Having ridden both bikes, the rider decided to own a Raider. Enough said.

 

Last Updated on Friday, 02 April 2010 23:41
 
Copyright © 2010 Test Site. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.